Engaging Students in the Scientific Practices of Explanation and Argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
A Framework for K–12 Science Education identifies eight science and engineering practices for K–12 classrooms. These practices, along with core ideas and crosscutting concepts, define our nation’s learning goals for science. An important advance from earlier standards (AAAS 1993, NRC 1996), these practices are clearly identified not as separate learning goals that define what students should know about the process of science. Instead, the scientific practices identify the reasoning behind, discourse about, and application of the core ideas in science.
منابع مشابه
Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation
Constructing scientific explanations and participating in argumentative discourse are seen as essential practices of scientific inquiry (e.g., R. Driver, P. Newton, & J. Osborne, 2000). In this paper, we identify three goals of engaging in these related scientific practices: (1) sensemaking, (2) articulating, and (3) persuading. We propose using these goals to understand student engagement with...
متن کاملSCOPE Engaging Students in the Scientific Practices of Explanation and Argumentation Understanding
A Framework for K–12 Science Education identifies eight science and engineering practices for K–12 classrooms. These practices, along with core ideas and crosscutting concepts, define our nation’s learning goals for science. An important advance from earlier standards (AAAS 1993, NRC 1996), these practices are clearly identified not as separate learning goals that define what students should kn...
متن کاملOnline Discussions as a Tool to Engage Students in Authentic Scientific Argumentation
The purpose of this research is to explore various aspects of scientific argumentation as it occurs both face-to-face and on asynchronous online discussion boards. Engaging students in authentic scientific discourse is considered a primary goal of science education, but there are many challenges to accomplishing this in the classroom, and potentially even more challenges in an online environmen...
متن کاملGroupware for developing critical discussion skills
1 September 1995 Abstract Increasingly, social and collaborative processes are seen as central to the development of thinking skills, including the skills of scientific thinking. With colleagues we have developed a software system (Belvedere) to support high-school science students in engaging in collaborative reasoning and argumentation. We discuss how Belvedere is designed to support students...
متن کاملUsing model-evidence link diagrams to weigh alternative models in argumentation
50 S cientifically literate citizens need to understand how scientists evaluate competing explanations. Likewise, students must learn to critically evaluate the quality of scientific knowledge and weigh alternative explanations. Regrettably, high school graduates often aren’t critically evaluative about scientific topics. To help remedy that, this article presents an instruction scaffold—called...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012